Earning More, Receiving Less: Loss of Benefits and Child Hunger
2010
September 2010
不
Summary of Findings
- Families that lose SNAP or TANF benefits when they exceed income eligibility limits experience higher rates of child food insecurity than those currently receiving benefits.
- Child food insecurity is linked with worse child health outcomes.
Key Terms and Definitions
- Household Food Insecurity is limited or uncertain access to enough nutritious food for all household members to lead an active and healthy life due to economic constraints. Food insecurity increases the likelihood that children will be hospitalized, have developmental delays, iron-deficiency anemia and/or be in fair or poor health.
- Child Food Insecurity occurs when children experience reductions in quality and/or quantity of meals because their caregivers can no longer buffer them from the household’s inadequate food resources. Child food insecurity intensifies the harmful health impacts associated with household food insecurity.
Public assistance programs protect children from food insecurity
Within the Children’s HealthWatch sample, the rate of child food insecurity among those currently receiving SNAP is 6.9 percent. In comparison, among families that have lost SNAP benefits due to an increase in income, the rate was 8.9 percent. Similarly, those who previously received TANF have significantly higher rates of child food insecurity than those currently receiving benefits. Children’s HealthWatch research has shown that SNAP and TANF reduce, but do not eliminate, the likelihood of household food insecurity. In part, this is because those most in need (i.e. those most likely to be food insecure) are also most likely to enroll in the programs and, in the case of SNAP, because the benefits are insufficient to cover the actual cost of a healthy diet. Nevertheless, the programs form an important buffer from hardship for children.
‘Cliff effect’ counteracts progress towards self-sufficiency
While a higher income can be an important step in a family’s progress towards self-sufficiency, the increased child food insecurity in this group suggests they may be experiencing the ‘cliff effect.’ This occurs when a increase in income causes an overall reduction in total resources due to a loss of benefits or increased tax liability. Despite research that has recognized the cliff effect, until now there has been no data on what this phenomenon means for children’s health.
Conclusion
Research clearly indicates that not all families leaving public assistance programs are financially able to afford adequate nutrition. This has critical implications for children’s short- and long-term health and development. Children’s HealthWatch supports policies that:
- Make it easier for families to apply for and maintain their benefits.
- More closely match the value of benefits to the real cost of healthy food.
- Ensure that families that experience modest increases in income do not lose critical supports that make it possible for children to maintain a healthy diet.
While our country continues to face fiscal challenges, we must remember that the health of our youngest citizens will shape our future economic well-being. Investments in policies that help ensure the health of young children are a critical step in determining our nation’s success